R. C. Sharma (ed). South Asian Urban Experience, Criterion Publicaton, 1988. pp. 211 – 221
The main objective of this paper is to develop an adequate urban strategy in the context of Kathmandu. The first section identifies the role that Kathmandu should be playing in the national urban system. This is followed by the identification of problems and issues in relation to the assigned role and the objectives. Urban policies are then evaluated to examine how far these are addressed to the issues raised and the problems identified. Finally an urban strategy is suggested for the development of Kathmandu.
The Role of Kathmandu in the National Urban System
Nepal is a small country (141,000 km. 2 ) with a population of 15 million (1981). The population growth rate is 2.66 per cent per annum. Broadly speaking, Nepal can be divided into three physical divisions : (i) the Terai; (ii) the hills; and (iii) mountains. Because of differences in resource endowments and investments, the Terai region and the Kathmandu valley of the hill region are relatively more developed. The population distribution is also highly irregular. The Kathmandu Valley with 0.4 per cent of the total area of the country has 50.0 per cent of the total population giving a population density of the city of Kathmandu alone is 20,000 persons per sq. kilometre. The Terai covering about 17.4 per cent of the total land area has 62.2 per cent of the total cultivated area and 36 per cent of the total population. The average population density in the Terai has increased from 140.5 to 212.8 persons per sq. kilometre between 1971 and 1981. The highlands of the mountain region has got a population density of mere 10 persons per sq. kilometre. In order to integrate the hill economy with that of the Terai and to alleviate the problems of regional disparity, attempts were made to create regional centres in the hills. However, except for Kathmandu and Pokhara, these could not function as growth poles. Most of the terai towns are growing at a much faster rate. Experience has shown that it is too costly as well as unrealistic to create growth poles under adverse natural conditions. Two things are now plausible :
1. To encourage the growth of Kathmandu Valley.
2. To extend the growth of the terai towns towards the foothills de-emphasising the border region towns.
Both of these strategic elements imply for a much greater growth in Kathmandu and in the hierarchy of national urban system, the primacy of Kathmandu has to be established. This calls for a much greater urban management capabilities in Kathmandu to absorb population increase in a much faster rate. The following will reinforce this contention :
1. Nepal being a small country, with the development of transport and communication, the national capital will be able to effectively influence the entire country. To create other centres is not necessary.
2. Given the relatively developed stage of Kathmandu, instead of creating other national/regional centres, Kathmandu can play a meaningful role in the integration of the national space by synthesising interregional ideas, disseminating technology and information, etc.
3. This is the centre of decision-making affecting the fate of the people far and wide. Even by creating rivals to Kathmandu, this role is not going to be delegated to other centres.
4. Results of investments in the Valley region can be made easily accessible to other parts of the country.
How far the strategy outlined above can realistically be pursued can be ascertained after analysing the potentials of Kathmandu in terms of land availability, job opportunities and income and cost effectiveness in providing urban infrastructures and services within the resource and institutional constraints. These need be assessed in relation to the planning processes and policy responses in the past.
Implicit in the foregoing discussions is that planning strategy for Kathmandu will depend on national policy on population distribution and employment. Based on the above assuming that intermediate cities will be created in the Terai region, Kathmandu will be the only city which will call for urban management capabilities of immense dimension. The long term goal should, therefore, focus on urbanising Kathmandu at a much faster rate.
The population of the three towns of the Kathmandu Valley in 1971 and 1981 are given in Table 1. Urban growth rate is 4.2 per cent per annum. The average density of Kathmandu and Lalitpur combined was 102 persons per hectare. The total urban area is increasing rapidly. In 1981 the total area of Kathmandu and Lalitpur was 3,100 hectares. The area within the Ring Road is 5,600 hectares.
TABLE I. Population of Kathmandu Valley Towns
Town
Population 1971
Population 1981
Urban Area 1981
Kathmandu
150,402
235,160
Lalitpur
59,049
79,875
Kathmandu Lalitur
209,451
315,035
3100 ha.
Bhaktapur
40,112
48,472
154 ha.
The population of the three towns is now estimated at 424,000 while the total urban population of the country is 1,363,000. The share of Kathmandu Valley towns is 31.1 per cent. By the end of the century, total urban population will be 3,996,000 (Table 2), i.e., 8 per cent of the projected national population of 25 million. Accordingly the urbanisation rate will be 7.43 per cent per annum. If this urbanisation trend is to be well accommodated within regional/national development context to achieve the objectives defined
TABLE 2 Urban Population Distribution
Urban settlements in
Population 1985
Population 2000
Kathmandu Valley
424,000 (31.1)
1,771,000 (44.3)
Others
939,000 (68.9)
2,225,000 (55.7)
Nepal
1,363,000 (100.0)
3,996,000 (100.0)
Figures in the parenthesis show percentage.
earlier, the city of greater Kathmandu (i.e., including Lalitpur) should be allocated an annual population increase of at least 10 per cent. In the initial years this means absorbing about 30,000 persons every year. By the end of the century the total Kathmandu Valley urban population will be 1.77 million. Of this it is proposed that Greater Kathmandu will have 1.4 million with a population density of 250 persons perhectare. The remaining 370,000 persons will be distributed among satellite settlements including Bhaktapur. Kathmandu Valley towns will then share 44.34 per cent of the total urban population and Greater Kathmandu 35.04 per cent. After this period, the population in the Greater Kathmandu will be stabilised and further increase will be absorbed by compact settlements of the Valley.
In order that Kathmandu may continue to function as the regional/national centre and also build the absorption capacity to cope with the increasing population, it is essential to create jobs, build infrastructures, provide services and facilitate housing development. Kathmandu is already well within the national transport and power grid. The presence of national level services, e.g., Tribhuvan University, national level hospitals, and being the seat of the national Government as well as the entrepot to the outside world, there is no doubt that this role will be well assumed and maintained by Kathmandu in the future as well.This means the more pressing and urgent response should be city level management to cope with the increasing population. It will be relevant to discuss the existing urban conditions in order to understand the magnitude of the problems.
Problems and Issues of Urban Development
These are discussed in relation to housing, employment and infrastructures and services.
Housing
As nearly 94 per cent of the houses have permanent structures, shelter is not a major problem.A modest shelter can be built in around Rs. 15,000 affordable to the 30th percentile given the extended family system, free labour and self-help practices. Sanitation is a major problem. Only 5 per cent have private toilets. The core area housing 40 percent of the urban population does not have well maintained drainage. There is no storm drainage. Most of the houses are fast deteriorating. As the ground floors in the core area are being rented to low-income group at an affordable rent, the core area providesmixed-income housing. This pattern can be continued if urban upgrading programmes are effectively launched. 40 per cent of the population are living in the traditional core in houses of relatively good quality using only 10 per cent of the urban land. De-densification is taking place because of the deteriorating housing conditions. Being the part of the owner occupied houses dwellings are also in good conditions. This system of tenure and vertical stratification of income creates the most favourable conditions for the implementation of environmentalimprovement programmes with good cost recovery as households with varying incomes can be made to participate. In order to maintain the inner city area, a traditional urban planning approach has been used in the past which augmented the land consumption for housing. For instance, in the Kuleswore Housing Project, land was expropriated and landowners compensated at a very low price of Rs. 32 per sq. metre making the low density of 127 persons per hectare possible. Kuleswore is well located in an area of rapid growth. It has 661 new plots and 89 existing houses. Of the total plots, there are 158 numbers of 130 sq. meters, 191 Nos. of 195 sq. metres, 67 Nos. of 260 sq. metres, 219 nos. of 360 sq. metres and 27 Nos. of 400 sq. metres. Housing development schemes do not address the main issues of improving resource use, cost recovery, financial replicability and meeting the needs215 of low-income group.
Because of allocation of land in the urban fringe to low income group in the past by the Government, low income squatter settlements had been prevented. But now a small plot of unserviced land (50 sq. metres) on the urban fringe is not affordable below the 60th percentile. Land price is very high and land market is secretive. Neglect of inner core area, adoption of modern/western standards and the construction of the Ring Road have increased \urban land consumption. There are more than 1,000 families squatting on different parts of the city. If immediate action is not taken, there will be sprawling growth of squatter settlements.
Ownership of dwelling is of great value to the people. It provides durable assets with appreciations over time, social prestige, income if rented out, and help to take loans. More and more dwelling units are rented out meaning more and more people have no security of tenure. Multiple occupancy has also increased from 21 per cent in 1961 to 79 percent in 1977. Housing density has increased and space per person has decreased. An estimate showed that there was a backlog of 9,300 houses in 1981. The cost of dwelling units has increased due to rise in land prices.
Employment
The present rate of urbanisation is only 4.2 per cent.. There are sufficient urban jobs at present. However, with 10′ per cent annual increment in labour force, available jobs will soon be exhausted. A very optimistic urban employment projection is presented in Table 3. This projection is based on the assumption that urban investment will continue to be 15 per cent of the GDP till the end of this century. Employment generated in industry, power, transport, communication, services and commerce will be all urban generated in settlements with more than 10,000 population. The total employment at present is 384,000. The available labour force is only 171,000. In the year 2000, there will be a shortage of employment of 77,000.
TABLE 3 Employment Trend
In thousands
1985
2000
Annual growth
rate (%)
Total Urban Population
1363
3996
7.43
Total Urban Labour Force
691
2026
7.43
Total Employment generated
1406
2076
2.63
Greater Kathmandu Population
372
1400
10.00
Greater Kathmandu Labour Force
171
644
10.00
Greater Kathmandu Employment Generated
384
567
2.63
Source : PADCO/USAID, Urban Development Assessment , Nepal, Kathmandu, 1984, pp. 145-47 (based on).
Infrastructures and Services
Kathmandu Valley cities have relatively better urban infrastructures and services in relation to other urban areas. Within the Ring Road, there are 103 kilometres of black top road, 49 kilometres of gravelled road and 72 kilometres of fair-weather road. The total urban roads in the country are 275 kilometres of black top, 147 kilometres of gravelled road and 21 1 kilometres of earthen tracks. The problem is mainly the utilisation of the existing road infrastructures. The maintenance part is not well-coordinated with other infrastructural works. The 27 kilometre long Ring Road needs to be exploited by systematically planning for the development of suitable areas around the Ring Road. High density settlements within the Ring Road in relation to the existing transport network should be developed. Within the valley most of the compact settlements have easy access but yet more such settlements need be provided with easy access with Kathmandu. At the national level Kathmandu is well within the national transport and power grid.
Existing power supply in the Kathmandu Valley is 3.218 Megawatts (1982). The quantity of urban power in Kathmandu is adequate, although the standard of the quality is not maintained. Use of power in industry is limited and should, therefore, be extended.
As regards to water supply and sewerage, although Kathmandu has relatively better water supply and a modem sewer line has been recently constructed, the conditions are far from being satisfactory. At most places, water supply is intermittent with lots of leakages and contamination with ground water. Sanitation conditions arc very poor. A foreign aided solid waste disposal project is in operation but yet the major part of the city is not clear and people’s attitude needs to be changed.
There are 28,000 telephone lines in the Valley towns. The communication system of Kathmandu with other areas is good and improving very fast.
For the present, Kathmandu enjoys adequate essential services like health and education and people all over the country make use of these facilities.
Major problems of providing and maintaining various infrastructures and services are as follows:
(i) Lack of integrated action among various utility agencies : Urban roads contain a wide variety of utilities including water supply, tele-communication, sewers, storm drainage and power. There is no meaningful coordination among different agencies to avoid damage and disruption of road service.
(ii) Lack of a responsible agency for storm drainage.
(iii) Low density development, sprawl growth, and vacant land have led to inefficiency and costly provision of urban infrastructures and services. Absence of vacant land tax system and any mechanism to recapture unearned income have made the provision of infrastructures costly and cost recovery difficult. Land-use regulation and building by-laws have not been compatible with the provision of low cost infrastructures and services.
(iv) Lack of coordination of agencies dealing with infra- structures and services with agencies dealing with industry, agriculture has led to inefficient growth.
(v) Limited cost recovery.
(vi) Lack of maintenance.
(vii) Limited private sector financing.
(viii) Lack of evolution of proper and affordable standards.
(ix) Limited people’s participation especially in maintenance.
(x) lack of proper role-casting.
Evaluation of Urban Policies
This section examines how far the issues raised have been addressed by urban policies of the Government. Till early sixties, there had been no systematic urban planning efforts. The town planning functions in the Kathmandu Valley were fulfilled by the Kathmandu Valley Construction Committee whose actions consisted in building some basic infrastructures and beautification projects implemented whenever resources were made available. In 1963, Physical Development Plan for the Kathmandu Valley was prepared. This plan was never approved. The recommendations were predominantly physical and not supported by economic data. The next Plan, the Kathmandu Valley Physical Development Plan was prepared in 1969. This Plan was comprehensive but being rather ambitious could not be implemented. Regional development policies introduced in 1971 also de-emphasised investments in Kathmandu. The 1969 Plan is a traditional zoning map aiming at regulating land-use in the Valley.
However, the somewhat imprecise limits of the zones combined with the strict restrictions they brought on development made the Plan difficult to enforce. The Kathmandu Valley Development Plan J976, is a more accurate zoning and land-use plan. However, the Plan proved to be inadequate due to the following :
(a) It is control-oriented and did little to promote planned development. The Ring Road could not yet be utilised.
(b) The Plan failed to strengthen institutional set-up.
(c) The Plan failed to be action-oriented. More pressing problems remained unsolved.
(d) Integrated action of different line agencies could not be achieved.
(e) Resource mobilisation and development of self-financ- ing urban system were not given adequate attention. Cost recovery, affordability and replicability of various urban programmes were not considered.
(f) Maintenance aspects including maintenance budgets were neglected.
(g) People’s participation in development programmes were not considered.
Kathmandu Valley Physical Development Concept, 1984 also could not get rid of the above-mentioned shortcomings except that the need for developing land around the Ring Road was established. The concept is based on the population projection of the Valley in the year 2000 as 1,029,166. This presumption itself is not only undesirable but also unrealistic.
Strategies for Urban Development
The urban scenario given in section II clearly depicts that it will, by no means, be an easy task to provide housing, infrastructures and services and generate adequate income and employment to the population projected at ten per cent annualincrement. Urban strategies should aim to achieve the following :
(a) Substantial increase in political awareness among the local leadership and creation of local leadership for urban development programmes.
(b) Development of multi-level, multi-dimension and multi- sectoral planning process.
(c) Substantial improvements in inter-Govcrnmental working relationships on urban affairs.
(d) Integration of planning objectives with taxation, finance and law,
(e) Provision of employment, shelter, physical infrastructures and social services particularly to the urban poor by developing effective urban management system at the urbanlevel.
Realising that resources available for urban development are by no means sufficient to face the problems of develop- ment, it is essential to ensure affordability and replicability of various urban development programmes and maximum cost recovery should be aimed at. For this, the following strategies should be pursued :
(a) The tax base at the Nagar Panchayat level should be widened and strengthened and local level resources should be channelised to urban development efforts.
(b) The planning and implementation capabilities of the Nagar Panchayat should be strengthened. Replicable projects should be conceived, initiated, designed and implemented at this level. The Nagar Panchayat should have a very powerful and effective division on urban development which will not •only formulate action-oriented integrated planning process but -also ensure inter-agency integration and effective inter-institu- tional role-casting.
(c) Below the Nagar Panchayat level, people should beencouraged to organise themselves for improvement schemes and housing development programmes. People’s programmes •conceived at the ward level should be integrated at the Nagar Panchayat level. The participation of non-Govemmental organizations should be encouraged and facilitated. By encouraging people’s participation in planning, implementing and cost sharing, small projects can be replicated more easily with greater impact.
(d) A realistic as well as viable approach in the adoption of ■standards should be evolved and pursued. Land should be used as efficiently as possible.
(e) The movement from high cost, modern, high techno- logy, capital intensive, monumental and centrally controlled services to low cost, traditional, low technology, labour intensive, incremental and locally controlled services should be facilitated.
(f) In order to increase income, employment and hence affordability, emphasis should be given to intensive agriculture, small scale industries and tourism. But with the density of around 250 persons per hectare pulse institutional, commercial and touristic land-uses, most of the land within the Ring Road will be used. Land-use outside the Ring Road should, therefore, be judiciously decided upon. Industries could be located at suitable compact settlements of the valley. Diversification of tourism and intensive agriculture should be considered at suitable locations within the valley. These should be plannedin order to create jobs. Intensive agriculture, tourism diversification and cottage industry are three main potential areas where jobs can be created with minimum costs. Land-use implications of these activities should be clearly understood and the present trend of lavish/extravagant use of land should be totally controlled. Outside the Ring Road it is possible to control/conserve land-use by discouraging haphazard growth.
References
H.M.G. of Nepal, 1984, Kathmandu Valley Physical Development Concept , Kathmandu : Kathmandu Vally Town Planning Team.
H.M.G. of Nepal, 1969, The Physical Development Plan for the Kathmandu – Valley, Kathmandu : Department of Housing and Physical Planning. ,
H.M.G. of Nepal, 1983, Urbanisation and National Development , mimeo, Department of Housing and Physical Planning.
USAID/PADCO, 1983, Urban Development Assessment: Nepal „ Kathmandu,
World Bank, 1982, Urban Sector Memorandum: Nepal.